economic systems

Urban Public Goods: Congestion, Funding, and Access

5 weeks · 32 hours · Case-based cohort · City-focused

City service map with public goods nodes marked in pencil

Participants analyze user fees, grants, and land-value capture with attention to administrative feasibility. Case studies include dense metros and smaller municipalities with different tax bases.

ZAR 890 · informational price · see Returns & Refunds

What is included

  • Spatial equity checklist for service pricing
  • Simulation on political resistance to user charges
  • Mentor clinic on communicating maps to councils
  • Optional module on informal settlement service access
  • Peer review on revenue forecasting assumptions
  • Office hours on GIS-free methods for small teams
  • Reading group on metropolitan governance reforms

Outcomes

  1. Propose a funding mix with explicit equity trade-offs
  2. Identify when user-pay schemes worsen exclusion
  3. Align capital plans with operating budget realities
Portrait placeholder for Peter Maseko

Lead mentor

Peter Maseko

Urban policy economist with transport and water finance background.

Participant notes

Urban Public Goods pushed me to separate capital ribbon-cutting from operating sustainability—finally on paper.
Zanele · Metro budget officer · 4/5 · internal feedback

Questions

No, we teach map-free methods for teams without GIS capacity.